An Open Access Journal | Publisher - Bansilal Ramnath Agarwal Charitable Trust's, Vishwakarma Institute of Information Technology, Pune-48 |
VJER Journal Header
Join Reviewer Board
Email following details to: editor_chief@vjer.in
 Title (Mr. /Mrs. /Dr./Prof.)
 Full Name
 Profession
 Affiliation /Institute
 Country
 Email
 Telephone Number
 Area of Expertise
 A brief CV
Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement    Reviewer Board Members    

To join VJER journal reviewer board, send your request with updated CV to editor_chief @ vjer.in

 

Publication and authorship:

  1. All submitted papers are subject to strict peer-review process by at least two reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular research paper.  
  2. The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability and language.  
  3. The possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection.  
  4. If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.  
  5. Rejected articles will not be re-reviewed.  
  6. The paper acceptance is constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism.  
  7. No research can be included in more than one publication.

Reviewers' responsibilities:

  1. Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information.  
  2. Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author. 
  3. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.  
  4. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.  
  5. Reviewers should also call to the Editor in Chief's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.  
  6. Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.